Imagine voting everyday

Posted on February 6th, 2009 by Derek McBurneysadsa in Rants, Responsible Buying

Imagine voting everyday.  Terrible thought isn't it?  Well I hate to break it to you, but that is exactly what we are doing, except for maybe those lazy Sundays where even rolling out of bed seems like an insurmountable challenge.  But before I start thinking about the weekend, I have to finish this article as it's something I've discussed a bunch lately but never put the pen to the page on, er, keyboard to the (web)page.  We vote every single day.  It's like a federal election every 24 hours, except with higher turnout.  Allow me to explain...

Every day, we vote with our dollars.  Everything we buy (or don't buy), is a statement.  Sometimes we make strong statements with our purchases, say, picking fair trade chocolate instead of the regular stuff.  Other times, it's less inspiring, say choosing a 42" tv over a 40".  But either way, a vote is being made.  You just told Nestlé to stuff it, and you just told Toshiba that bigger really is better.  And guess what?  Toshiba and Nestlé are listening to you, they're counting the ballots and seeing if the people elected them to another term of profitability.


Okay, so maybe picking Special K Vanilla Almond above Red Berry isn't the most noble statement to make.  Not all of our decisions can be inspiring.

But how much power do we really have?  We've all heard that mumbo jumbo about how something like the wealthiest 5% of Americans earn 35% of the wealth (which is certainly a much smaller number in Canada thankfully).  That sounds pretty bad, but if you look at it glass half full instead of half empty, that means 95% of us earn 65% the wealth.  Okay, I won't lie, that still sounds pretty awful, but 65% is the majority of the wealth, and in other words, the majority of the votes.  With that 65% majority, we effectively have all the power, since we can choose who we'd like the wealthiest 5% of the population to be depending on what we buy.

So what kind of choices are we making?  Well, I might not be a certified market analyst, but fortunately I don't have to be to see a clear trend in the choices we make.  The largest trend of our buying, or voting (yes I'll beat that metaphor to the death!), is that we like things that are CHEAP!  Now, I can't blame us for wanting things cheap.  Of course we want things cheap, it can be tough to save money.  The problem is we haven't really been saving (though that should change now that the bubble has popped and a recession has started, but that's a whole other topic right there).  Typically, we use the money we save to buy more things.  More cheap things.  And all is well, right?

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services.
Homer: Woo-hoo!

All is not well.  The bad thing about choosing products based solely on their price is that we neglect the other costs of the product.  Environmental costs of producing and shipping the product aren't passed to you directly, but passed on to everyone through the destruction of our planet.  Environment and economy aren't mutually exclusive, they're actually two sides of the same coin, and governments are beginning to wake up to the fact that environmental costs now will create real and massive economic costs later.  While we should pressure our governments whenever we can for appropriate environmental regulation on business, instead of waiting to vote on the issue once every few years in elections, we can vote every week in grocery stores and in shopping malls.


Uh oh, it's another election day: B.C. or New Zealand gala apples?  As much as I love New Zealand, I can't say I'm crazy on eating produce that has more frequent flyer miles than I do.

Buying responsibly makes a difference.  Big corporations may appear to be faceless giants with little regard for the environment, but the fact is, if we keep buying products based solely on their price tag, we are voting in favour of their environmental negligence and driving their business plan.  One purchase, just like one vote, will probably never change an outcome, but together, buying responsibly will make a difference.  At the very least you can be proud of who you're voting for.  Even if it is Vanilla Almond over Red Berry.



4 comments:

Comment made on February 12th, 2009 at 10:32 pm by Lachlan

LachlanAnd for this reason, it's a good idea to check out the Calgary Farmer's Market. Yes, it's more expensive, but your body will thank you in the long run as you are thoroughly nourished by high-quality, locally-grown food.
The only two problems (three if you count price) are that you have to make sure that what you buy is local, because there is some fruit & vege there from far-flung continents, and the other is that winter selection is limited. What I do is buy my bananas, pineapples, kiwifruit, etc etc during the winter when most local food is shipped in anyway, and then go back to awesome local food in the spring/summer/fall.

Comment made on February 13th, 2009 at 11:46 pm by Derek McBurneysadsa

Derek McBurneysadsaYeah good advice. Though my inner monkey keeps me guilty of buying bananas year round...

Comment made on February 16th, 2009 at 4:52 pm by Diana

DianaI heard they're closing down the Calgary Farmer's Market. Is that just a rumor? If not, then what will our options be after? Also, I've never been to the Farmer's market because to me it seems like a pretty far drive for a couple of apples and some lettace.

Comment made on April 29th, 2009 at 4:16 pm by Tommy

TommyYes. I totally agree with buying responsibly... and incorporating the left-out external and environmental costs into the prices.

However, I think the concept of "Monetary Democracy" is seriously flawed within our current economic system, because of the great inequalities in wealth that the system inevitably produces. Which you alluded to in the percentages of wealth distribution...

Although, digging into the distribution further (from 2006 Statistics Canada data): Overall, the top 20% had 69.2% of total net worth, while the bottom 20% had 2.4% and the bottom 60% had 10.8%. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think working class Canadians (income is earned by a wage or salary, which is most of us) hold the "majority" in that respect.

If $1 is 1 vote, there is a huge inequality in the distribution of votes. And the gap between rich and poor is definitely not getting smaller.

Even if those at the bottom of the economic spectrum still enjoyed some decent minimal standard of living, a concentration of wealth at the top will nevertheless undermine social cohesion, well-being, and democracy. For example, economists have identified a phenomenon called “positional consumption,” by which people’s emotional well-being is negatively influenced by unfavourable self-comparisons to the lifestyles of the rich and famous. Not to mention the attention that big corporations place on advertising their products for people to buy.

But yes!! I definitely think that responsible buying is important... but I think it can be limiting if it is not done lockstep in addressing bigger economic issues.

Great post!

Add a comment

You are not signed on, but you can comment. Your comment may need to be approved, to skip the wait for approval, sign up. If you have an account, sign on.

Sponsors

Contact us for sponsorship opportunities


 
dmcbdesign